Showing posts with label Camera Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Camera Review. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Pentax 17 - First Impression


Every once in a while, a camera comes along that reminds me why film photography continues to attract new photographers while keeping longtime shooters interested. The Pentax 17 is one of those cameras.

A friend recently loaned me a Pentax 17, and after putting a couple of rolls through it, I came away with a generally positive impression.

First Impressions

The first thing I noticed was just how enjoyable the camera is to carry. It’s remarkably lightweight and compact enough to slip into a pocket, purse, or backpack. That helps it compete with the cellphone, which has the obvious advantage of almost always being with you.

The Pentax 17 is also extremely quiet. Its shutter produces a soft, unobtrusive sound that makes the camera comfortable to use in museums, restaurants, for street photography, or anywhere else you don’t want to call attention to yourself. The camera even includes a dedicated food-photography zone setting, reflecting the way many people now photograph and share their daily experiences.

The camera has a fixed 25mm f/3.5 lens, which gives a field of view roughly comparable to a 37mm lens on full-frame 35mm. That is consistent with many compact point-and-shoot film cameras I’ve used. Modern lens design has obvious advantages, and the Pentax produced negatives with good sharpness and pleasing contrast.

It’s a simple detail, but I liked the film reminder holder on the back. I also appreciated the ISO range of 50 to 3200, which covers nearly all commonly available films. The dial has marked settings for ISO 50, 100, 200, 800, and 3200, along with intermediate settings for 125, 160, 400, and 1600. The ISO dial also has a locking mechanism, which is a thoughtful feature.

I was surprised by how much I liked the zone-focusing system compared with manual focus or autofocus. During my test, I used the mountain setting most often. I missed focus on only one or two images, and those were the result of my own errors rather than the camera.

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

A Familiar Experience with a Modern Twist

Although the Pentax 17 is a new camera, it doesn’t try to imitate a modern digital camera. Instead, it embraces the slower, more deliberate pace that many of us enjoy about film photography.

If you’ve used classic half-frame cameras such as the Olympus PEN series or Canon Demi models, much of the shooting experience will feel familiar. At the same time, the Pentax benefits from modern manufacturing, a dependable exposure system, and a newly designed lens.

For photographers discovering half-frame for the first time, the format offers several advantages. First, it effectively doubles the number of exposures on a roll of film, reducing the cost per image for both film and processing.

Second, the default half-frame image is vertical, which feels familiar to anyone accustomed to viewing photographs on a phone or social media. Turn the camera vertically, however, and it produces a horizontal composition closer to the traditional 35mm format.

What I Didn’t Like

My initial impression also identified several features that I think could be improved.

The first issue is the maximum shutter speed of only 1/350 second. That can be limiting in bright sunlight, particularly with faster film or when the camera selects a wider aperture than desired. The camera provides exposure compensation from –2 to +2 stops, but that does not eliminate the underlying shutter-speed limitation.

Since most of my photography is outdoors, including street and landscape photography, I would generally pair the Pentax 17 with ISO 100 or 200 film.

The mode dial and zone-focus ring both felt looser than I expected. Although each has click stops, both were easy to move inadvertently. I found myself regularly checking the settings to confirm that nothing had changed, particularly after pulling the camera from a pocket or camera bag. A lock on at least the mode dial would be a welcome improvement.

The film advance lever also left me wondering about long-term durability. It functioned properly throughout my time with the camera, but compared with many classic mechanical cameras, it felt somewhat delicate. Time will ultimately tell whether that concern is justified.

Finally, the shutter release seemed to have a very slight lag in all modes and very little travel. This wasn’t an issue for most of my photographs, but there were a few occasions when the shutter did not seem to react immediately.

Is the Price Fair?

One criticism I’ve seen online concerns the camera’s price.

Personally, I think Pentax priced it reasonably. This is a newly designed and manufactured film camera that, overall, feels well built. Its image quality is substantially better than that of readily available disposable cameras, and it offers nearly all the features a casual photographer would need.

More importantly, buying a new camera means getting a warranty, modern electronics, available service and support, and the confidence that everything should work as intended. That is worth something.

If we want companies to continue investing in new film cameras, we also have to recognize that they cannot be priced like used equipment manufactured fifty years ago.

Final Thoughts

After spending a couple of rolls with the Pentax 17, my overall impression is quite positive.

It is lightweight, compact, quiet, and equipped with a very good lens. More importantly, it is simply enjoyable to use.

Would I change a few details? Certainly. I would like firmer controls and a more substantial-feeling film advance lever. Those refinements would make an already good camera feel even better.

The Pentax 17 isn’t trying to replace anyone’s favorite vintage camera, nor should it. Instead, it offers something increasingly rare: a thoughtfully designed, newly manufactured film camera that encourages people to slow down and enjoy the process of making photographs.

For me, that is a welcome addition to today’s film-photography landscape.

Here are a few examples of images I took during my test.

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200


















Monday, June 1, 2026

Widelux F7


The Widelux F7 is currently my new favorite camera. I purchased it April 2026 for $1,865 from Used Photo Pro / Roberts Camera located in Indianapolis. It's in excellent condition. The only issue is a missing shutter release button collar.

The Widelux is a unique 35mm panorama camera. The unique feature is a moving swing 26mm lens. The lens sweeps across the film plane during the exposure.  

A few features:

  • Ultra-wide field of view up to approximately 140 degrees horizontal.
  • 3 shutter speeds: 1/15, 1/125 & 1/250.
  • Aperture settings of f/2.8, 4, 5.6, 8 & 11. However, the aperture can be set anywhere between f/2.8 - f/11 (i.e. f/9).
  • Negative size of 24x59mm.
  • Uses normal 35mm film.
  • Fully manual - no battery required.
  • Fixed focus from 5-6' to infinity. The Widelux isn't useful for closeup.
  • Surprisingly compact (This past weekend I carried it in my shorts pocket).
  • Top plate bubble level.
  • Very clear viewfinder.
  • Unique image rendering.
    • Creates images with distinctive curved "immersive" perspective
    • Moving subjects can appear stretched, compressed or distorted for creative effects.
Here is how the swing lens works at 1/15 & 1/250:



The downsides in my experience with the Widelux are:
  • No light meter. An external meter or modified sunny 16 is required.
  • On sunny / overcast days (i.e. street photography) low ISO film is often needed (I primarily use 50-100 ISO film).
  • Loading the Widelux has a learning curve.  
  • You only get 20 images on a 36 exposure roll.
  • Rewinding the film can be rough on your thumb / fingers. The rewind knob has a bit of resistance & very deep, somewhat sharp ridges. 
  • The swing lens is mechanically complex requiring periodic maintenance to prevent uneven exposure ("banding"). I haven't run into this yet, but it was an issue with a Widelux I previously borrowed.  
  • In my experience having a level camera is important unless you are looking for a specific creative look.
  • Because the field of view is so wide you need to hold the camera in a unique way to avoid photographing your fingers.
  • These are NOT inexpensive cameras. No signs of price decreasing anytime soon.
Top plate & back of the camera showing clean lines and function layout:


I'm vert happy a Widelux became available and that I was able to purchase it. Here are some recent images:

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50
Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Kodak Ektar 100

Kodak Ektar 100

Leica Monopan 50

Leica Monopan 50

Leica Monopan 50





Friday, December 12, 2025

Ricoh KR-5 Super II SLR


I purchased a Ricoh KR-5 Super II SLR from Roberts Camera's annual Tent Sale this year. At the tent sale all equipment is purchased "as-is" which means there is no guarantee the equipment works. However, the prices are so low (purchased by volume) it's work the risk. 

I mounted a Pentax f/1.2 50mm lens and added a battery. The camera worked including the light meter. 

Here are a few specs and what I like / dislike about the camera. The Ricoh KR-5 Super II is a fully manual, manual focus SLR using a Pentax K mount lenses. Based on information I read it was considered an "affordable, student camera".

Features:
  • Shutter speed from bulb to 1/2000,
  • Flash sync speed of 1/125
  • Manual ISO between 25-1600
  • Manual "split screen" focusing
  • Shutter operates without a battery, but the meter uses a standard LR44 / SR44 styled battery
  • + o - style light meter
  • Shutter release lock 

I tested the KR-5 with a couple of rolls of film. I found the camera is on the small side so somewhat awkward to hold. It's also very light weight and plasticky. However, if you like all manual, light weight cameras with all needed features then this is a camera for you. I consider this camera the plastic cousin to the more robust Pentax K1000.

Here are images from the test rolls of Kentmere 400.














I found with my Ricoh KR-5 Super II that many images are VERY soft. Not sure if this is the lens or the camera (focus slightly off?). However,  it's a nice looking camera that covers all the bases.



Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Olympus OM2000 Spot Metering 35mm SLR Camera


I purchased an Olympus OM2000 Spot Metering SLR body from Used Photo Pro in Indianapolis sold in an “as-is” condition. I haven’t used this camera model previously, so I was interested in giving it a try. This copy looked very clean. The camera didn’t have a battery to check the light meter but as in the past even “as-is” condition cameras are typically in reasonable / good working condition. Even if the light meter didn’t work the camera will still operate without a battery. The price was approximately $25. 

The OM2000, built by Cosina, is an all-manual camera (excluding the light meter) that has spot meter option for the light meter. Focus, aperture and speed settings are all manual. 
I mounted a Tamron 28mm f/2.5 lens. The Tamron does not have an Olympus OM mount so I used an Adaptall 2 adapter from my inventory. 

The features of the OM2000 Spot Metering are:
  • Lens: Olympus OM bayonet mount,
  • Shutter type: Vertical-travel metal focal-plane shutter,
  • Shutter speeds: 1 to 1/2000 second + bulb,
  • Flash sync speed: 1/125 second,
  • Exposure modes:
    • Manual exposure only
    • Center-weighted metering with “match-LED” display in viewfinder
  • Metering system:
    • TTL center-weighted metering
    • Ability to switch to spot metering
    • Manual exposure match-LED indicator
  • ISO range from 25 to 3200 (no DX code reading),
  • Battery: 2 x LE44,
  • Hot shoe (no built-in flash),
  • Manual film advance lever,
  • Small switch on the film advance lever that can be used for double exposures.
The OM2000 was clearly an entry-level manual SLR camera. Lots of plastic and small in your hand. 

I wanted to see how the camera would perform with street photography.

I ran 2 rolls through the camera recently and here is what I thought about it:
  • A very loud shutter slap. Not stealthy at all
  • The light meter consists of a + o – LED indicator on the left side of the viewfinder. It’s activated when you half push the shutter release. You adjust speed / aperture (or both) so the green o illuminates. I found it hard to get it settings adjusted accurately for the proper exposure. On most shots I was getting + o or o – (slightly over or under exposed).  In most situations I ended up simply using “sunny 16”. Not sure if this is the sensitivity of the light meter or the meter on this camera was beyond it’s used by date. Either way, I prefer a camera with a light meter vs not having one. On the OM2000 you are in full control of the settings.
  • Another “feature” is a small “stop” attached to the film advance lever that sits under the shutter release button when the lever is fully closed. This prevents the shutter from accidentally firing while in a camera bag or if you bump the shutter release. To take a photo you advance the film advance lever slightly to a stop. You can now release the shutter. There were several times when I forgot to do this and when I tried to release the shutter I couldn’t. Just a learning curve issue, but potentially frustrating if you were timing a shot. 
  • The wide shutter speed range gives you complete flexibility of using almost all film ISOs in most light conditions.

Bottomline, not my first choice for street photography, but it’s a solid general-purpose, basic manual camera. 

Some photos: