Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Pentax 17 - First Impression


Every once in a while, a camera comes along that reminds me why film photography continues to attract new photographers while keeping longtime shooters interested. The Pentax 17 is one of those cameras.

A friend recently loaned me a Pentax 17, and after putting a couple of rolls through it, I came away with a generally positive impression.

First Impressions

The first thing I noticed was just how enjoyable the camera is to carry. It’s remarkably lightweight and compact enough to slip into a pocket, purse, or backpack. That helps it compete with the cellphone, which has the obvious advantage of almost always being with you.

The Pentax 17 is also extremely quiet. Its shutter produces a soft, unobtrusive sound that makes the camera comfortable to use in museums, restaurants, for street photography, or anywhere else you don’t want to call attention to yourself. The camera even includes a dedicated food-photography zone setting, reflecting the way many people now photograph and share their daily experiences.

The camera has a fixed 25mm f/3.5 lens, which gives a field of view roughly comparable to a 37mm lens on full-frame 35mm. That is consistent with many compact point-and-shoot film cameras I’ve used. Modern lens design has obvious advantages, and the Pentax produced negatives with good sharpness and pleasing contrast.

It’s a simple detail, but I liked the film reminder holder on the back. I also appreciated the ISO range of 50 to 3200, which covers nearly all commonly available films. The dial has marked settings for ISO 50, 100, 200, 800, and 3200, along with intermediate settings for 125, 160, 400, and 1600. The ISO dial also has a locking mechanism, which is a thoughtful feature.

I was surprised by how much I liked the zone-focusing system compared with manual focus or autofocus. During my test, I used the mountain setting most often. I missed focus on only one or two images, and those were the result of my own errors rather than the camera.

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

A Familiar Experience with a Modern Twist

Although the Pentax 17 is a new camera, it doesn’t try to imitate a modern digital camera. Instead, it embraces the slower, more deliberate pace that many of us enjoy about film photography.

If you’ve used classic half-frame cameras such as the Olympus PEN series or Canon Demi models, much of the shooting experience will feel familiar. At the same time, the Pentax benefits from modern manufacturing, a dependable exposure system, and a newly designed lens.

For photographers discovering half-frame for the first time, the format offers several advantages. First, it effectively doubles the number of exposures on a roll of film, reducing the cost per image for both film and processing.

Second, the default half-frame image is vertical, which feels familiar to anyone accustomed to viewing photographs on a phone or social media. Turn the camera vertically, however, and it produces a horizontal composition closer to the traditional 35mm format.

What I Didn’t Like

My initial impression also identified several features that I think could be improved.

The first issue is the maximum shutter speed of only 1/350 second. That can be limiting in bright sunlight, particularly with faster film or when the camera selects a wider aperture than desired. The camera provides exposure compensation from –2 to +2 stops, but that does not eliminate the underlying shutter-speed limitation.

Since most of my photography is outdoors, including street and landscape photography, I would generally pair the Pentax 17 with ISO 100 or 200 film.

The mode dial and zone-focus ring both felt looser than I expected. Although each has click stops, both were easy to move inadvertently. I found myself regularly checking the settings to confirm that nothing had changed, particularly after pulling the camera from a pocket or camera bag. A lock on at least the mode dial would be a welcome improvement.

The film advance lever also left me wondering about long-term durability. It functioned properly throughout my time with the camera, but compared with many classic mechanical cameras, it felt somewhat delicate. Time will ultimately tell whether that concern is justified.

Finally, the shutter release seemed to have a very slight lag in all modes and very little travel. This wasn’t an issue for most of my photographs, but there were a few occasions when the shutter did not seem to react immediately.

Is the Price Fair?

One criticism I’ve seen online concerns the camera’s price.

Personally, I think Pentax priced it reasonably. This is a newly designed and manufactured film camera that, overall, feels well built. Its image quality is substantially better than that of readily available disposable cameras, and it offers nearly all the features a casual photographer would need.

More importantly, buying a new camera means getting a warranty, modern electronics, available service and support, and the confidence that everything should work as intended. That is worth something.

If we want companies to continue investing in new film cameras, we also have to recognize that they cannot be priced like used equipment manufactured fifty years ago.

Final Thoughts

After spending a couple of rolls with the Pentax 17, my overall impression is quite positive.

It is lightweight, compact, quiet, and equipped with a very good lens. More importantly, it is simply enjoyable to use.

Would I change a few details? Certainly. I would like firmer controls and a more substantial-feeling film advance lever. Those refinements would make an already good camera feel even better.

The Pentax 17 isn’t trying to replace anyone’s favorite vintage camera, nor should it. Instead, it offers something increasingly rare: a thoughtfully designed, newly manufactured film camera that encourages people to slow down and enjoy the process of making photographs.

For me, that is a welcome addition to today’s film-photography landscape.

Here are a few examples of images I took during my test.

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Aerocolor 100

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200


















Monday, June 1, 2026

Widelux F7


The Widelux F7 is currently my new favorite camera. I purchased it April 2026 for $1,865 from Used Photo Pro / Roberts Camera located in Indianapolis. It's in excellent condition. The only issue is a missing shutter release button collar.

The Widelux is a unique 35mm panorama camera. The unique feature is a moving swing 26mm lens. The lens sweeps across the film plane during the exposure.  

A few features:

  • Ultra-wide field of view up to approximately 140 degrees horizontal.
  • 3 shutter speeds: 1/15, 1/125 & 1/250.
  • Aperture settings of f/2.8, 4, 5.6, 8 & 11. However, the aperture can be set anywhere between f/2.8 - f/11 (i.e. f/9).
  • Negative size of 24x59mm.
  • Uses normal 35mm film.
  • Fully manual - no battery required.
  • Fixed focus from 5-6' to infinity. The Widelux isn't useful for closeup.
  • Surprisingly compact (This past weekend I carried it in my shorts pocket).
  • Top plate bubble level.
  • Very clear viewfinder.
  • Unique image rendering.
    • Creates images with distinctive curved "immersive" perspective
    • Moving subjects can appear stretched, compressed or distorted for creative effects.
Here is how the swing lens works at 1/15 & 1/250:



The downsides in my experience with the Widelux are:
  • No light meter. An external meter or modified sunny 16 is required.
  • On sunny / overcast days (i.e. street photography) low ISO film is often needed (I primarily use 50-100 ISO film).
  • Loading the Widelux has a learning curve.  
  • You only get 20 images on a 36 exposure roll.
  • Rewinding the film can be rough on your thumb / fingers. The rewind knob has a bit of resistance & very deep, somewhat sharp ridges. 
  • The swing lens is mechanically complex requiring periodic maintenance to prevent uneven exposure ("banding"). I haven't run into this yet, but it was an issue with a Widelux I previously borrowed.  
  • In my experience having a level camera is important unless you are looking for a specific creative look.
  • Because the field of view is so wide you need to hold the camera in a unique way to avoid photographing your fingers.
  • These are NOT inexpensive cameras. No signs of price decreasing anytime soon.
Top plate & back of the camera showing clean lines and function layout:


I'm vert happy a Widelux became available and that I was able to purchase it. Here are some recent images:

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50
Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Ilford PanF Plus 50

Kodak Ektar 100

Kodak Ektar 100

Leica Monopan 50

Leica Monopan 50

Leica Monopan 50





Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Canon Pellix 35mm SLR Camera

I purchased a Canon Pellix from Used Photo Pro in Indianapolis in their "as-is" section for approximately $25. This is a unique SLR for the time because it has a semi-transparent mirror (fixed pellicle mirror) vs the traditional SLR mirror. The camera was introduced in 1965 and only produced through 1966 replaced by the Pellix QL (Quick Load) which was produced through 1970.

The camera was equipped with a TTL CdS light meter positioned behind the mirror. With a fixed translucent mirror there is no mirror movement which prevented viewfinder blackout when shooting (not a big issue honestly) and reduced vibration (good for slow shutter speeds / long exposures). No "mirror slap". However, the viewfinder is dimmer since the light through the lens is split. I personally didn't notice this as an issue in my shooting. 

Pellix without a lens showing the semi-transparent mirror


A few features:
  • Completely manual camera with a light meter.
  • Shutter speed from B + 1s to 1/1000.
  • Canon FL lens mount. This type of lens readily available, very bright and affordable in many focal lengths.
  • A dial on top of the camera that activates the viewfinder blind. This can be used for long exposures (The only camera I own that has this feature. I don't thing I'll ever use it, but it's still cool.).
  • Accessory cold shoe.
  • Match - needle light meter exposure display (you adjust speed or aperture until the needle rests inside the small circle).
  • Shutter button lock.
  • Easy to use mechanical self timer.
  • Cloth shutter curtain.
Some issues:
  • The ISO/Din numbers are VERY small and red. ISO is set on the shutter speed dial visible in 2 very small openings. The ISO numbers are VERY hard to read in my experience.
  • Max ISO when using the light meter only goes up to 800. Any faster film will need to be used without a meter.
  • No hot shoe.
  • Takes a 1.35V PX625 style battery which are available but NOT readily common. HOWEVER, the Canon Pellix operates without a battery. You just won't be able to use the light meter.
Top of camera, viewfinder curtain dial below the film rewind knob

Viewfinder in normal / open setting


Viewfinder closed

I've should a few rolls of Eastman Vision3 250D in both 200 & 250 ISO through my Pellix. Here are examples:










Overall, I think this is a well build, sturdy basic Canon FL mount SLR with basic features. I'm glad I have it in my collection HOWEVER, there are other FL mount Canon's that I prefer. 





Monday, April 13, 2026

Film Negatives - Flat or Curl (Updated June 10, 2026)

Flat Negatives Are Your Friends

Photographic film negative curling can be an issue if you develop film yourself. During the digitizing or printing workflow your negatives will need to be scanned, photographed or used in a darkroom enlarger. Having film negatives "flat" is important. Even the slightest curling / cupping of the negative can make the film difficult to put into a scanner holder, keep flat on the scanner glass or keeping the entire photo in focus. You WANT your negatives to be as flat as possible for good results.

Different film stocks "curl" / "cup" to various amounts or remain flat while drying. How you dry your negatives (i.e., hanging with a weighted clip on the bottom) or your drying conditions (i.e., humidity level) will also impact how much a negative does or does not dry flat.

Here are a couple examples of flat and slightly curled negatives. Your results may be similar or much more cupping / curling.

Fomapan 400 dries flat

Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400 has a moderate curl. This negative has been back-rolled

There are DIY ways to flatten curled negatives. You can cut your negatives, sleeve them and put them under a weight (like a book) for several hours. You can back-roll the negative before cutting and keep it back-rolled for a few hours until flat, etc.

Again, what ever process you use, the simplest is to use film (WHEN POSSIBLE) that dries flat.

To help you decide, here is a list of films I've used / developed and how they "typically" end up when dried.  Please note, this list covers just 35mm film. 120 film curls more or less the same but if it curls it tends to curl more than 35mm. AGAIN AS A CAVEAT, your experience may vary.

  • Aerocolor 100 - flat
  • ADOX HR50 - flat
  • Agfa APX 100 - flat
  • Agfa APX 400 - slight curl
  • Arista EDU 100 / 200 / 400 - flat
  • Arista EDU 100 DX - flat
  • Arista EDU 400 DX - flat
  • Berger Pancro 400 - slight curl
  • Camera Film Photo (CFP) 500T The Film - flat
  • Candido 200 - flat (Vision2 200T remjet removed)
  • Candido 400 - slight curl (Vision3 250D remjet removed)
  • CFP Kiki Pan 320 - flat
  • CineStill BWXX - slight curl
  • Dubblefilm Jelly - flat
  • Eastman Double-X (5222) - flat
  • EFKE 100 - curls
  • Fomapan 100 - flat
  • Fomapan 200 - flat
  • Fomapan 400 - flat
  • FPP Mummy - flat
  • FPP RetroChrome 320 - curls
  • FPP Wolfman 100 - flat
  • Fujicolor Pro400H - light curl
  • Fujifilm Provia 100 - curls
  • Fujifilm 200 - slight curl
  • Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400 - curls
  • Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia 800 - flat
  • Harman AZURE - slight curl
  • Holga 400 - flat
  • Ilford Delta 100 - flat
  • Ilford Delta 400 - flat
  • Ilford FP4 - flat
  • Ilford HP5 - flat
  • Ilford Kentmere 400 - flat
  • Ilford Ortho 80 - flat
  • Ilford PanF Plus 50 - flat
  • Ilford PAN 400 - flat
  • Ilford SPX 200 - flat
  • Ilford XP2 400 - flat
  • JCH Streetpan 400 - flat
  • Kiki Pan 320 - slight curl
  • Kodak Double-X - slight curl
  • Kodak Ektar 100 - flat
  • Kodak Ektachrome 100 - flat
  • Kodak EliteChrome 100 - curls
  • Kodak EliteChrome 200 - curls
  • Kodak Ektapan 100 (T-Max 100) - flat / very slight curl
  • Kodak Gold 200 - slight curl
  • Kodak Gold 200 in 120 - curls
  • Kodak Kodalith 6556 - flat
  • Kodak MAX 400 - curls
  • Kodak Plus X 125 - slight curl
  • Kodak Portra 160/400 - flat
  • Kodak Portra 800 - flat
  • Kodak T-Max 400 - flat / slight curl
  • Kodak T-Max 3200 - flat / slight curl
  • Kodak Tri-X - curls
  • Kodak Ultramax 400 - flat
  • Kodak Vision3 250D - flat
  • Kodak Vision3 500T - flat
  • Kodak X-Pan 125 - slight curl / flat
  • Kono Moonstruck - flat
  • Kosmo Foto Agent Shadow - slight curl
  • Leica Monopan 50 - flat
  • Lucky SHD100 Pro - flat
  • Lucky SHD400 - flat
  • LuckyPan 400 (old formula) - flat
  • ORWO UN54 - flat
  • Rollei Infrared 400 (AGFA Aviphot Pan 200) - flat
  • Rollei Retro 80s (AGFA Aviphot Pan 80) - flat
  • Rollei Retro 400s (AGFA Aviphot Pan 200) - flat 
  • Rollei RPX25 (AGFA Aviphot Pan 80) - flat
  • Secret Sauce Color 100 (Aerocolor 100) - flat
  • Shanghai GP3 - curls
  • Street Candy 400 - slight curl
  • Silberra Ultima - flat
  • Ultrafine 100 - flat
  • Ultrafine Finesse 100 - flat
  • Ultrafine Finesse 400 - flat

I'll update this list as I get feedback from others or have personal experience with other films.




Tuesday, March 17, 2026

New Week Different Camera – Canon A-1

This week’s “New Week Different Camera” is a Canon A-1. I’ve used this camera about a year ago after I got it but thought I should give it a go again. 

What is the camera: The Canon A-1 was an advanced amateur / prosumer manual focus FD-mount 35mm SLR. The camera was introduced in 1978 and manufactured until 1985. It was preceded by the Canon EF and replaced by the Canon T90. It was considered the 1st SLR that had all 4 exposure modes (P, A, S, M or P, Av, Tv, M in Canon speak). Competitive equivalents of the time were the Nikon FE, Minolta XD-11, Pentax ME Super and the Olympus OM-2N to name a few

Where did I get the camera: I purchased the Canon A-1 (body only) at Roberts Camera “as-is” during their August 2025 Tent Sale. Roberts has a bi-annual Tent Sale (also called a Garage Sale) to sell excess inventory / unloved / “parts only” cameras and accessories. They either sell items on a set price or by “box”. They offer different sizes of boxes and you pay a fixed price for the box. Anything that fits into the box only costs the price of the box.  

I got the A-1 along with 31 other camera bodies I was able to fit into 4 boxes.

One note, about ½ of the cameras of the 32-camera lot ended up being unusable (which was expected).


How much did it cost: Each box was $25 so I spent $100 for the 32 cameras so the A-1 worked out to be just over $3.

Key features:
  • Canon FD lens mount (there are many affordable FD lenses available)
  • All 4 exposure modes (P, A, S & M) – I used P mode
  • Shutter speeds from 30s – 1/1000 including B
  • Flash sync speed of 1/60 
  • Shutter button lock
  • Convenient battery check light
  • TTL center weighted metering
  • LED red exposure display at bottom of viewfinder (speed & aperture)
  • ISO range from 6 – 12,800
  • Uses LR44 batteries (6v total)
  • All metal body
  • Exposure compensation dial
Plus / Negatives based on my experience: 

Pros = good looking all black camera, easy to use in all exposure modes, excellent ISO range, easy to find and affordable lens selections  

Negatives = LED speed and aperture readout in viewfinder is sometimes hard to see in bright settings, won’t work without batteries, flash sync speed is too slow to be used with studio lights at typical light settings, top speed is reasonable but not as fast as later SLR’s & develops the typical Canon SLR shutter “squeal” (mine has it).

Thoughts / Will I use it again: Overall, a great-looking capable camera! It has all the features I use for street and casual photography. The viewfinder is bright and the light meter on my version is true. I have all the lenses I normally use for SLR’s (28, 35 & 50mm) so I can use the A-1 in most settings I prefer. The main downside on my version is the shutter squeal is very noticeable so limits its use as a street photography camera. I will definitely use the A-1 again.

My rating: 4 out of 5

Images:

Kentmere 400

Kentmere 400

Kentmere 400

Kentmere 400

Kentmere 400

Kentmere 400

Kentmere 400

Kentmere 400

Kodak 5302

Kodak 5302

Fomapan 200

Fomapan 200

Fomapan 200

Fomapan 200

Fomapan 200

Fomapan 200

Fomapan 200